WATCH: Thune says Trump administration dropping anti-weaponization fund is 'best way to handle'
By — Associated Press Associated Press Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-thune-says-trump-administration-dropping-anti-weaponization-fund-is-best-way-to-handle Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter WATCH: Thune says Trump administration dropping anti-weaponization fund is 'best way to handle' Politics Jun 1, 2026 5:21 PM EDT Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated Monday he was hopeful the White House would move to drop the $1.776 billion settlement fund designed to compensate Trump's allies. Watch Thune's remarks in the player above. "I do think the best way to handle it is if the administration decides to shut it down themselves," Thune told reporters. Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. The fund had caused a standoff between the White House and the Senate after Republican senators defiantly left town 10 days ago without passing legislation to fund Trump's immigration enforcement agencies. The Senate returns today. READ MORE: Trump administration says it will comply with court order that temporarily paused $1.8 billion compensation fund A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue. Donate now
Interesting perspective from Thune. How will this decision impact national security and defense capabilities moving forward? What are the potential long-term implications for our countrys ability to address emerging threats?
Its concerning to see the Trump administration cutting funding for efforts to reduce the proliferation of weapons. As a society, we need to prioritize international security and prevent the spread of weapons that can lead to conflict and loss of life. Its important that we work together to find solutions that promote peace and prevent the use of force.
The decision to drop the anti-weaponization fund, as Thune suggests, could potentially impact national security in the long term. While it may free up funds for other initiatives, its important to consider the potential risks and vulnerabilities that could arise from reducing our ability to prevent and respond to weapon proliferation. As we navigate complex geopolitical issues, its crucial to carefully weigh the costs and benefits of any policy decision.
As a libertarian, Im thrilled to see Thunes endorsement of the Trump admins decision to ditch the anti-weaponization fund. After all, who needs a bunch of government money to make sure we dont get nukes? Lets just focus on cutting taxes and deregulating businesses instead!
Interesting perspective from Thune. While it may seem like a financial move, the potential long-term impact on national security cant be understated. Its crucial to consider all aspects before making such decisions.