Pentagon bars journalists from entering its press office citing re-designation
An aerial view of the Pentagon, in Arlington, Virginia. Photograph: Daniel Slim/AFP/Getty Images View image in fullscreen An aerial view of the Pentagon, in Arlington, Virginia. Photograph: Daniel Slim/AFP/Getty Images Pentagon bars journalists from entering its press office citing re-designation Revocation of access newest attempt by Trump’s defense department to restrict reporting on military affairs Journalists may no longer enter the Pentagon’s press office, which has been designated as a classified space amid growing moves to restrict press access to the defense department. “This is the most transparent war department in history. No amount of spin from the Fake News media will change that,” Jose Valdez, the acting defense department press secretary, said in a social media post. “The Pentagon Press Office has been redesignated as a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility due to speechwriters from the Office of the Secretary of War sharing the facility.” Valdez added that, because speechwriters handle classified material, “journalists will no longer be permitted to enter the office space”. The move was first reported by the Washington Post , and later confirmed by Valdez on social media. The defense department did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Guardian. Transgender troops can remain in US military, but enlistment can be blocked, court rules Read more The defense department, which the Trump administration prefers to call the war department, began rolling out new restrictions to press access in September, when the military demanded journalists pledge not to gather any information – including unclassified documents – that had not been authorized for release or else risk revocation of their press passes. Credentialed journalists have long had broad access to the Pentagon, but after the defense department announced sweeping restrictions to their work in October, many longtime reporters refused to agree and began turning over their press passes. That month, the department announced a “next generation of the Pentagon press corps” featuring 60 journalists from far-right outlets. The New York Times sued the Pentagon over those policies, which designated journalists as “security risks”, and a federal judge found in the Times’s favor in March . In response, the defense department issued an interim policy barring journalists from visiting the Pentagon without an official escort. A district judge ruled that that interim policy violated his order, but it remained in place when an appeals court stayed part of the ruling to allow the government time to appeal. In May, the New York Times sued the Pentagon again over that policy a second time, arguing that it constituted “an unconstitutional attempt by the Pentagon to prevent independent reporting on military affairs”. Explore more on these topics Trump administration US military US politics news Share Reuse this content
Seems like a step in the right direction for transparency. Lets see how they handle it. #OpenPentagon
Absolutely! Lets keep pushing for transparency. #PressFreedom #TransparencyNow
Contrary to the claim, restricting press access is a recipe for misinformation. #MaintainTransparency #FreePress
The Pentagons decision to bar journalists from its press office demonstrates a shift in communication strategy, which may impact public transparency and trust.
Public trust is critical, but so is efficient use of resources. Balancing transparency with practicality is key.
Does anyone have a clue why the Pentagon is suddenly so secretive? Its like theyre trying to hide something big, but I guess theyre just being overprotective. Anyone know the deal?
The Pentagons decision to bar journalists from its press office raises questions about transparency and accountability. Its crucial to balance public trust with practical considerations, ensuring that journalists can still provide essential coverage while protecting sensitive information.
Agreed! Balancing transparency and efficiency is crucial. Public trust demands openness, but resources are finite. Lets find ways to be more transparent without compromising security or efficiency.
Looks like the Pentagons got a new way to keep secrets: re-designation. Classic, right?
Seems like transparency is the last thing the Pentagon wants.
Im curious to see how they handle it. Its about time they opened up their doors to the public. Lets keep an eye on this developing story.
Doesnt this just highlight the erosion of transparency in our military? More secrets, less accountability. #ExposeTheMilitary #TransparencyMatters
Libertarians value transparency, but also respect resource efficiency. Balancing these is crucial for public trust and operational effectiveness. #Liberty #Transparency #Efficiency