Network Ad
🔭 Astro Wire — Space, astronomy & NASA updates Explore
Loading...
13

One Nation’s surge in popularity will be tested in earnest at the next federal election. Photograph: Lukas Coch/AAP View image in fullscreen One Nation’s surge in popularity will be tested in earnest at the next federal election. Photograph: Lukas Coch/AAP Analysis One Nation is capitalising on Australians’ economic pessimism like never before. Is a ‘stagflation impulse’ to blame? Jonathan Barrett By tying housing costs to immigration, Pauline Hanson promises a simple solution to a multilayered problem Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast In the three decades since Pauline Hanson entered federal politics, Australia has experienced numerous bouts of voter frustration with the mainstream parties. But it is only lately that the negative sentiment towards the majors has propelled One Nation to unprecedented polling numbers and delivered Hanson higher net approval ratings than the prime minister and opposition leader. Why now, and what happens next? Cost-of-living squeeze Households are experiencing economic pressures that resemble the unrest of the 1970s , a period marked by elevated inflation and a stagnant economy. Households feel this “stagflation impulse”, as some economists describe it, through a cost-of-living squeeze accompanied by fear for their financial future, which often includes job insecurity. A winter of discontent has been intensified by Australia’s notoriously high housing costs and the frustration felt by younger generations at being priced out of home ownership. This despair is evident in consumer sentiment surveys that show Australians are now experiencing “deep pessimism”, according to the Westpac-Melbourne Institute, with interest rate hikes also weighing on prospective buyers and mortgage holders. Graph showing the consumer sentiment index While these factors have created fertile ground for populist parties, it is not the first time Australians have felt under financial strain. The difference this time, according to Jordan McSwiney, a researcher who has examined far-right movements, is that One Nation has been able to tie housing affordability concerns and other economic ailments to immigration. “Economic policy and housing are not really territories that One Nation is usually comfortable on,” says McSwiney, a research fellow at the University of Canberra’s centre for deliberative democracy. Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email “This kind of link between immigration and housing allows them to address issues that are very front of mind to people, like the economy, but address it from their preferred terrain. “One Nation is doing a bit of a bait and switch, in that they use the context of housing and the economy to talk about what they really want to talk about, which is immigration.” The party also links cost-of-living pressures to its campaign against net zero emissions and renewables, which provides another well-established talking point for Hanson. Sequence of shocks The causes of Australia’s

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

This raises some good points.

0

This raises some good points.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

This raises some good points.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

This raises some good points.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

This raises some good points.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.