Network Ad
🦕 Dino Wire — Paleontology & fossil discoveries Explore
Loading...
8

A soybean farm near West Bend, Iowa, on 6 May 2026. Photograph: Scott Olson/Getty Images View image in fullscreen A soybean farm near West Bend, Iowa, on 6 May 2026. Photograph: Scott Olson/Getty Images House Republicans to write $95bn bill to fund Iran war and aid farmers GOP-controlled chamber paves way for reconciliation bill, while making long-shot attempt at new voting restrictions House Republicans on Wednesday agreed to begin the process of writing a $95bn bill to fund the war with Iran as well as provide new aid to farmers, while making a long-shot attempt to impose new restrictions on voting nationwide. In a virtually party-line 216-214, the Republican-controlled chamber passed a budget resolution that paves the way for the creation of a reconciliation bill, which can advance through the Senate under special rules that circumvent the Democratic filibuster and requires only a simple majority to pass. Two Republicans – Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, as well as Kevin Kiley, an independent of California – joined all Democrats in opposing the measure. The resolution’s passage comes amid an intensification of the conflict with Iran, which Pete Hegseth, the the defense secretary, told the Senate on Tuesday has thus far cost $37.5bn . The Trump administration last month asked Congress to authorize approximately $88bn in supplemental funding, the majority of which – up to $67.1bn – will go to pay for the war. The budget resolution passed by the House largely answers that call by authorizing the armed services committee to propose $60bn in spending for the fiscal years through 2036, and the intelligence committee an additional $13bn. The $73bn sum is expected to go towards military operations against Iran. The agriculture committee has been allocated $12bn in spending changes, which it is expected to propose using on measures to help farmers rocked by the global effects of the conflict with Iran, as well as Trump’s tariff regimen against major trading partners. The House administration committee authorized a further $10bn, which is set to be used to make an unlikely effort to pass the Save America Act into law. The measure, championed by Donald Trump, would ban mail-in ballots nationwide and impose enhanced strict identification requirements on voters when they cast ballots and register. But legislation seeking to advance through the Senate under the rules of budget reconciliation can only deal with spending, revenue and the debt limit, making it likely that the Save America Act’s policy changes will be stripped out when the chamber takes up the measure. Mike Johnson nodded to that fact on Tuesday, when he told reporters the goal of the bill was to pass the Save America Act into law “as much of that as possible”. “As always, Republicans support our troops, our farmers and election integrity and we will demonstrate that again this week,” the Republican House speaker said. The budget resolution is the third attempt Republican

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.