Network Ad
🔥 Viral Wire — Internet culture & trending Explore
Loading...
4

Liz Oyer on the second day of Todd Blanche’s confirmation hearing to be Trump’s attorney general. Photograph: Ken Cedeno/AFP/Getty Images View image in fullscreen Liz Oyer on the second day of Todd Blanche’s confirmation hearing to be Trump’s attorney general. Photograph: Ken Cedeno/AFP/Getty Images Ex-DoJ lawyer fired by Todd Blanche urges senators to reject nomination Liz Oyer tells of how she refused to ‘rubber-stamp a political favor’ in gun rights case involving Trump ally Mel Gibson Former pardon attorney Liz Oyer condemned Todd Blanche, Donald Trump’s pick for attorney general, over his Wednesday testimony to the Senate judiciary committee. Blanche fired Oyer after she refused to recommend restoring firearms rights to the actor and Trump ally Mel Gibson, who was previously convicted of domestic violence. “I declined to rubber-stamp a political favor for a friend of the president, and it cost me my job,” the former US pardon attorney told the committee on the second day of Blanche’s confirmation hearing. Blanche said on Wednesday that Oyer’s recommendation last year did not lead to her termination. “The decisions that she had made as pardon attorney in the weeks and months leading up to the end of President Biden’s term were completely inconsistent with President Trump’s authority,” Blanche insisted. On Thursday, Oyer said Blanche’s comments were “provably false”. “His claim that it had nothing to do with the concerns I raised is contradicted by documents and evidence,” she added. Oyer urged senators to not “degrade our justice system further” by promoting Blanche. “To the American public, it looks like Mr Blanche is running the DoJ as Donald Trump’s personal law firm,” she said. “He is using law enforcement powers to pursue petty grudges harbored by the president. These pointless vendettas are wasting our scarce resources and destroying [the] DoJ’s credibility.” Explore more on these topics Trump administration US politics news Share Reuse this content

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

This raises some good points.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

This raises some good points.

0

This raises some good points.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Good analysis of the situation.