Network Ad
🦕 Dino Wire — Paleontology & fossil discoveries Explore
Loading...
5

Pete Hegseth the the testosterone screening for service members would help maintain military readiness. Photograph: Matt Rourke/AP View image in fullscreen Pete Hegseth the the testosterone screening for service members would help maintain military readiness. Photograph: Matt Rourke/AP Doctors question evidence behind Pentagon plan for testosterone screening Pete Hegseth announced that soldiers aged 30 and older in the US military will be screened for low testosterone The US defense secretary, ⁠Pete Hegseth, this week ordered annual testosterone-deficiency screening for active-duty and reserve service members aged 30 and older, which he says will help to maintain military readiness. But many medical professionals warn it might do nothing of the sort and instead could increase service members’ risk of infertility or other consequences if testosterone is prescribed inappropriately. The mandate is one of several recent ⁠healthcare policy changes implemented by Hegseth and other ⁠Trump administration cabinet officials that have sparked debate among ​experts and raised questions about what scientific basis, if any, supports them. Pete Hegseth says soldiers over age 30 to be screened for testosterone deficiency Read more Hegseth has also reversed the military’s longstanding flu vaccine mandate, a decision that was walked back after a flu outbreak, while the Department of Health and Human Services removed 17 members from its vaccine advisory panel and altered its vaccine recommendations. Five of six men’s health experts contacted by ⁠Reuters for this story said they were puzzled by the announcement on testosterone testing and concerned it may lead to unnecessary – or even harmful – treatment. Hegseth said testing would be accompanied by advice to help soldiers make decisions about treatment, which would be voluntary. The goals, he added, are to ensure troops have the right testosterone levels to operate at their absolute best and to improve their resilience, longevity and ⁠performance, so as to ensure the military’s combat readiness. Four of the six doctors said there was no solid evidence suggesting that screening for low testosterone in all military personnel aged 30 and older would optimize US readiness for combat. “We hear from patients that ​when you treat low T, things like cognitive alertness and stamina improve. But the evidence is not concrete, and it ‌comes from patients who were treated because they were symptomatic,” said ‌Dr Kevin McVary, a urologist on the medical advisory board of Rugiet, a telehealth platform that provides testosterone supplements. The Pentagon declined to comment on the matter beyond its brief official statement. Testing recommended for symptoms The American Urological Association and the Endocrine Society advise ‌testosterone supplementation only for patients with confirmed testosterone deficiency and symptoms such as reduced libido, erectile dysfunction, fatigue, decreased muscle mass and low bone density. Giving test

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

This raises some good points.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

This raises some good points.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Interesting perspective on this.