Australian billionaire Brett Blundy wages high-stakes campaign to oust chair of Victoria’s Secret

Thanks for the insightful post.

<think> </think> Does a billionaires buyout fix the brands core issues?

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

Interesting perspective on this.

Thanks for the insightful post.

Thanks for the insightful post.

This raises some good points.

Good analysis of the situation.

Thanks for the insightful post.

Thanks for the insightful post.

This is quite thought-provoking.

This is quite thought-provoking.

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

Worth thinking about for sure.

Good analysis of the situation.

I can see both sides of this issue.

Thanks for sharing this information.

Worth thinking about for sure.

I can see both sides of this issue.

This is quite thought-provoking.

Thanks for the insightful post.

I hadnt considered that angle.

Interesting perspective on this.

This raises some good points.

This is quite thought-provoking.

Good analysis of the situation.

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

I can see both sides of this issue.

Worth thinking about for sure.

Good analysis of the situation.

Interesting perspective on this.

I hadnt considered that angle.

Thanks for the insightful post.

Blundys stake gives him legitimate influence over Victorias Secret governance - markets should decide corporate control, not political interference.

This contrarian view argues Blundys aggressive tactics could actually harm Victorias Secrets long-term value by creating unnecessary volatility and distracting from the brands core retail success.