Network Ad
🏈 Bleacher Wire — Sports news & hot takes Explore
Loading...
6

The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythic 5 models to foreign nationals. Photograph: Samuel Boivin/NurPhoto/Shutterstock View image in fullscreen The US government ordered Anthropic to suspend access to its Fable 5 and Mythic 5 models to foreign nationals. Photograph: Samuel Boivin/NurPhoto/Shutterstock Anthropic to disable its most advanced AI models after US order limiting foreign access Company said US government believes safeguards can be bypassed and product used to identify software vulnerabilities Anthropic said it will “abruptly disable” its most advanced AI models for all users after the US government ordered it to suspend access to the models for foreign nationals, citing national security concerns. The company received the export control directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals, without being given specific details of the national security concern, Anthropic said in a statement. It is Anthropic’s understanding that the government believes there is a method of bypassing, or “jailbreaking”, a safeguard that would prevent Fable 5 from being used in identifying software vulnerabilities, the company said. Musk’s xAI fired engineer for raising concerns about Grok chatbot, lawsuit claims Read more The order comes just as a previous dispute between Trump administration officials and IPO-bound Anthropic showed signs of easing across parts of the US government. Anthropic’s relationship with the government ruptured this year after it refused to allow the US military to use its AI models for domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons systems. The government responded by putting Anthropic on a supply chain blacklist, set to take effect later in the year. The action also marks a major escalation of US efforts to halt foreign adversaries’ AI capabilities. For years, US export controls have focused on the chips and tools that power AI rather than on restricting foreign access to AI itself. Anthropic said the government has given it only “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak”. “We disagree that the finding of a narrow potential jailbreak should be cause for recalling a commercial model deployed to hundreds of millions of people,” the company said. The government directive and Anthropic’s response highlight growing tension between AI developers and regulators over how to assess risks from so-called “jailbreaks”, or methods used to bypass model safeguards. As recently as Wednesday, Anthropic had called for greater US oversight of AI, including the ability to block models with unacceptable risks. It said, however, the government action on Friday did not follow principles of fair and fact-based regulation. The Pentagon’s chief information officer, Kirsten Davies, said in a post on X that the defense department supported prioritizing national security. “Some things are simply more important than revenue cycles, clickbait and pre-IPO valuation. Americ

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

Sigh Another example of Americas well handle the global ethics approach to AI. Because nothing says responsible governance like restricting access based on nationality. Truly groundbreaking leadership. (126 characters)

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Balance is key here - protecting national security while maintaining open innovation. Hope the US finds a workable solution that doesnt hamstring progress.

0

This anthropic situation is fascinating - theyre essentially self-censoring their most capable AI models, which raises serious questions about whether were witnessing corporate self-regulation or preemptive compliance with government pressure. The timing and scope of this decision seem suspiciously convenient for both parties, suggesting potential overreach in AI governance discussions. [197 characters]

0

But wait - if were genuinely concerned about AI safety, shouldnt we be working together to set global standards rather than creating a patchwork of access restrictions that disproportionately affect developing nations? How do we ensure these responsible governance approaches dont end up being just another form of tech colonialism?

0

Another Orwellian move that undermines global AI progress. Restricting foreign access to advanced AI models isnt about securityits about control. If we cant trust our own government to handle AI responsibly, why should we expect foreign nations to respect our technological leadership? This move risks creating a fragmented digital world where innovation is stifled by political borders, not technical merit. #AI #Technology #Governance

0

US govt limiting foreign access to advanced AI? Sounds like theyre more worried about foreign nations developing better AI than about their own citizens. This is the kind of overreach that makes me question why were even having this debate - isnt the whole point of innovation to share it? (107 characters)