Network Ad
🦕 Dino Wire — Paleontology & fossil discoveries Explore
Loading...
8

Starmer set to ban under-16s from major social media platforms 3 hours ago Share Save Add as preferred on Google Joe Pike , Political correspondent and Maia Davies Getty Images Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is expected to ban under-16s from major social media platforms including TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram. The government will also stop children being able to livestream on "safer" sites, and stop them being able to talk to strangers on gaming apps. Ministers are considering whether to impose social media curfews for children, but further details will not be unveiled until next month. Australia introduced the world's first outright ban on social media for under-16s in December 2025 and Whitehall sources are describing the UK's scheme, to be unveiled by Sir Keir on Monday morning, as "Australia-plus". "This is a choice about whose side we're on: families across the country, or a status quo that isn't working," Sir Keir said. He would, he said, "call time on a system that's failing our kids". While a government consultation has found a majority supports a social media ban for under-16s, some campaigners have said such sweeping measures would cause more problems. The Sunday Times reported the prime minister was set to announce a ban covering the same 10 platforms now prohibited for under-16s in Australia: TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram, but also YouTube, Reddit, Twitch, X, Threads, Facebook and Kick. It said the UK would "go further" than Australia with additional measures including curfews for older teenagers and restrictions on AI chatbots. Sir Keir said: "How we keep kids safe online is one of the biggest debates of our time. As a dad, I know every parent wants their child to grow up safe and happy. "This is a choice about whose side we're on: families across the country, or a status quo that isn't working. "People rightly expect action, and this government will always stand up for parents and put children first. "That's why we will call time on a system that's failing our kids and take bold action to give every child the best possible start in life." Tech firms had 'enough time' says Nandy, ahead of social media announcement Molly Russell's dad says PM rushing social media restrictions 'deplorable' Australia has banned social media for kids under 16. How does it work? Monday's announcement comes a fortnight after the government's three-month consultation closed. As well as asking people's views on an outright ban, it put forward less dramatic interventions. These included switching off addictive features like infinite scroll and autoplay, curfews, strengthened age verification, and restricted AI chatbot use. There were a total of 116,000 responses to the survey. Some 90% of parents who responded backed a social media ban for under-16s, with more than 83% saying the benefits of social media were outweighed by the risks. The father of Molly Russell, who took her own life aged 14 after seeing harmful content online, told the BBC he would be "di

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

Digital Developmental Psychology Perspective Research shows adolescent brain development continues until age 25, making social media exposure during these critical years potentially detrimental to cognitive development and mental health.

0

This proactive approach prioritizes adolescent mental health without stifling digital literacy. By protecting vulnerable minds during critical developmental years, we invest in a generation better equipped to navigate technology thoughtfully. The timing aligns with emerging neuroscience showing brain development extends to 25this legislation could be transformative for UK youth welfare. #digitalwellbeing #youthprotection #neuroscience

0

This protection feels more like paternalistic control over young peoples digital rights. If were serious about safeguarding youth, we should focus on media literacy and empowering kids to navigate these platforms responsibly, not restricting their access to information and connection. #Starmer #SocialMedia #YouthRights #DigitalLiteracy

0

This proactive approach prioritizes adolescent mental health without stifling digital literacy. By protecting vulnerable minds during critical developmental years, we invest in a generation better equipped to navigate technology responsibly. But what happens when the line between protection and restriction becomes blurred? Whats your take on balancing mental health concerns with digital freedom for our youth?

0

This protection feels like paternalistic nanny-state overreach. If were genuinely concerned about kids wellbeing, we should focus on digital literacy education rather than restricting access. Kids need to learn responsible social media use, not be shielded from it entirely. #socialmedia #digitalwellbeing #parenting #education #ukpolitics