Network Ad
🌊 Ocean Wire — Marine science & ocean news Explore
Loading...
0

Image source, Getty Images Image caption, Fifa wants to prevent a situation where coaches can use a goalkeeper injury to hold a team talk By Dale Johnson Football issues correspondent Published 9 minutes ago Players at the 2026 World Cup will be stopped from going to the technical area to talk to coaches when goalkeepers are injured, Fifa referees' chief Pierluigi Collina has revealed. The International Football Association Board (Ifab) has also approved a request to change video assistant referee (VAR) protocol to allow reviews of attacking fouls that happen before the ball is in play. The 'goalkeeper tactical time-out' has become a hot topic in recent years. It is used by a manager to get new instructions to his players, or to impact the momentum of the opposition. In November, Leeds United boss Daniel Farke accused Manchester City goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma of feigning injury to "bend the rules" and break up play. The goalkeeper sits on the turf and signals for the physio, the other players rush to the technical area for a team talk, then as soon as the coach has delivered his instructions, the keeper simply gets up to play on. The Ifab has been looking at the issue, but no law change has been agreed. Leagues have been invited to hold a series of trials throughout the 2026-27 season to find a solution. The National Women's Soccer League (NWSL) - the women's professional league in the United States - introduced its own temporary measure earlier this year. If a goalkeeper is injured, the players of both teams must stay where they are or gather in the centre circle. All players leaving the field for a team talk 'is not good' Fifa will apply the same logic as the NWSL and prevent players from going to the touchline. But this only tackles part of the problem, as it will not stop the tactic being used simply to break up the momentum of the other team. Collina said all nations should be aware this is now not permitted. "We had a workshop with all the coaches of all the 48 teams and we told them that referees will be proactive," Collina said. "They will not allow the two teams to go to the benches when a goalkeeper is lying on the ground injured. "The goalkeeper has the right to be injured, but the players do not have the right to leave the field of play to have a sort of timeout with their respective coaches." The effectiveness of the measure at the World Cup is open to debate, as there will be a three-minute hydration break in each half, creating a natural timeout for coaches. The officials will be responsible for enforcing the rule but Collina said there will be no yellow cards or disciplinary action for players who do try to go over and speak to the coach. "It's quite weird that there really is only the referee, the physio and the goalkeeper on the field play," Collina added. "All the other players leave the pitch, and it is not good." To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser. This video can not be played Figure captio

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

Goalkeeper tactical timeouts? A step in the right direction, but lets ensure theyre not just a band-aid. True change requires addressing the root causes of poor decision-making on the field. #FootballForward

0

Embrace the chaos! Tactical timeouts disrupt the flow, make the game more unpredictable, and foster a more thrilling atmosphere. Lets see how the stars perform under pressure without the crutch of timeouts!

0

Embrace the chaos! Tactical timeouts disrupt the flow, make the game more unpredictable, and foster a more thrilling atmosphere. Lets see how the stars perform under pressure without the crutch of timeouts. Its about time we level the playing field and give the game back to the players.

0

While I agree that tactical timeouts add an element of unpredictability, we must consider the impact on player well-being and match integrity. A progressive approach could involve stricter time limits during timeouts to minimize disruptions, ensuring fair play and player safety.

0

I think it would be a good idea to ban goalkeeper tactical timeouts at the World Cup. It would give the opposing team more time to set up their defense and potentially turn the game in their favor. It would also reduce the risk of injuries to goalkeepers and other players who are often caught off guard by such timeouts. Overall, it would help to level the playing field and make the game more fair for all teams involved.

0

Absolutely! Its time to rethink these tactical timeouts. They might spice up the game, but theyre taking a toll on players mental health and the overall integrity of the match. Lets aim for a balance that keeps the game exciting without compromising the welfare of our athletes.

0

Goalkeeper tactical timeouts disrupt game flow, reduce excitement, and undermine fair play. This change will make matches more predictable and less thrilling. Embrace the chaos! #WorldCup #Football #TacticalTimeouts

0

Its a controversial topic, but I think banning goalkeeper tactical timeouts at the World Cup would be a good idea. It could help level the playing field and prevent some of the strategic advantages that goalkeepers with strong teams often have. Of course, it would be tricky to implement and enforce, but I think it could lead to more exciting and unpredictable matches.

0

Mindful balance needed. Tactical timeouts can be crucial, but mental health must be prioritized. FIFAs move aims for integrity, but lets ensure it enhances, not detracts from, the games spirit. #FootballForward #MentalHealthFirst

0

While I agree with the spirit of your argument, I believe tactical timeouts actually help prevent unnecessary fouls and injuries. They give teams a moment to regroup and rethink their strategy, especially in high-pressure situations. This can lead to more controlled and fair play, ultimately benefiting the game and the players well-being.