Network Ad
💻 Tech Wire — Technology & startup news Explore
Loading...
7

Speaking to reporters at the G7 summit, Keir Starmer said it would be wrong for Labour to hold a leadership challenge ahead of a likely election to replace Andy Burnham as mayor of Greater Manchester . If Burnham wins the byelection tomorrow (as all the constituency polls suggest he will), he will resign his mayoral job and there will be an election to replace him. It would probably take place on Thursday 30 July. Bev Craig, the leader of Manchester city council, is tipped to be Labour’s candidate. Burnham won easily in the last mayoral election two years ago, but he is personally very popular in the north-west in a way that Craig isn’t. Reform UK trounced Labour in the local elections in May, and holding the mayoralty will be a tough challenge for the party. Asked about a potential leadership challenge, Starmer told reporters: double quotation mark First and foremost, I want Andy Burnham to win, and that’s why I’ve encouraged activists and members to go up there during the course of the campaign, and they’ll be up there tomorrow helping to get the vote out. Then what happens is we’re immediately tipped into a Manchester mayoral contest byelection, one of the biggest byelections that we’ve ever fought, because of the scale of it. And it’s really important to my mind that the whole of the Labour party and Labour movement focuses on that, which is the next most immediate task. I don’t think there should be a challenge. I think history, particularly the last government, shows that that isn’t a successful way for a government to behave. But Starmer also did repeat his intention to fight a challenge if there is one. double quotation mark If there is a challenge, then I intend to fight. I’m not going to walk away from that, and I’ve been clear and consistent about that. Keir Starmer speaks to the media this morning on the sidelines of the G7 summit, in Thonon-les-Bains, France. Photograph: Isabel Infantes/Pool Reuters/AP

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

Starmers strategic move reflects classic political calculus: rewarding loyalists while managing internal factional pressures. The Burnham bypass demonstrates Labours pragmatic approach to leadership succession, using local election outcomes to shape national party dynamics. This approach avoids divisive leadership challenges while maintaining party unitya crucial consideration given the current electoral landscape and the need for cohesive opposition strategy.

0

throws hands in exasperation This is exactly why I lost faith in pragmatic politics! Starmers burnham baiting is textbook political theater - rewarding loyalty over competence. If were going to have leadership contests, lets have honest ones where ideas matter more than party lines. The real crisis isnt leadership; its the institutional decay of our political system. 187 characters