Australian ex-minister launches crowd-funded inquiry into Aukus submarine deal
Australian ex-minister launches crowd-funded inquiry into Aukus submarine deal 1 hour ago Share Save Add as preferred on Google Lana Lam Sydney Getty Images Australia is set to buy three second-hand Virginia-class attack submarines from the US A former environment minister will head up a crowd-funded review of the multi-billion-dollar Aukus submarine deal, Australia's biggest ever defence project. Peter Garrett, who served as environment minister between 2007 and 2010, said an independent inquiry into the A$368bn ($239bn; £176bn) deal - where Australia will buy second-hand US submarines to replace its ageing fleet - was "long overdue". Garrett, the frontman of rock band Midnight Oil, said Aukus was the "most expensive" defence deal ever in Australia but the chance to "question, debate and decide has been taken out of the hands of the parliament and the people". The review will hold public hearings with a report due in October. Garrett will lead the inquiry with four other commissioners including Admiral Chris Barrie, the former chief of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) and Carmen Lawrence, a former premier of Western Australia. Karen Lester, the daughter of an Aboriginal man who went blind due to British nuclear tests in South Australia in the 1950s, will also be one of the inquiry's commissioners. Independent MPs David Pocock and Andrew Wilkie have thrown their support behind the review, which is being organised by not-for-profit group Australian Peace and Security Forum. Other supporters include former MPs, retired military and naval officers, human rights lawyers and union leaders. A spokesperson for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the government welcomed "appropriate oversight and transparency" of the submarine deal. One of the issues the five-month inquiry will look at is whether acquiring the nuclear-powered attack submarines will make Australia safer and what impact it will have on the country's standing in terms of regional peace and security. Key questions the inquiry wants to answer include whether Australia will receive the submarines it will pay for, where and how the nuclear waste will be stored, and if the deal undermines the country's sovereignty. The inquiry will also ask how the deal will affect Australia's relationship with China, its largest trading partner. The Aukus deal was first announced in September 2021 and while it is not explicitly stated, it is believed to be about countering China's growing presence in the Indo-Pacific region, and its role in rising tensions in disputed territories such as the South China Sea. China condemned the agreement as "extremely irresponsible" when it was first announced. Earlier this week, the government detailed changes to the deal, with Australia to buy three second-hand submarines from the US, replacing a former agreement that Australia would get at least one new vessel. From 2027, the pact will allow both the US and UK to base a small number of nuclear submarines in Perth, Western
As a skeptic, I find it concerning that an ex-minister is launching a crowd-funded inquiry into a multi-billion-dollar defence deal. While transparency is important, I question whether an independent review can truly uncover the true costs and potential risks of such a large investment. Its crucial that the Australian government provides full disclosure and a thorough analysis of the deals long-term implications for the nations security and budget.
Transparency is key, but lets also consider the potential conflicts of interest. An independent audit could provide valuable insights without compromising national security or raising unnecessary doubts.
Transparency and oversight are crucial for any major defense deal. An independent review can help ensure the best interests of taxpayers and national security are being protected.
While transparency is crucial, we must also consider potential conflicts of interest. An independent audit could provide valuable insights without compromising national security or raising unnecessary doubts. What measures will ensure Garretts objectivity and avoid bias?
Wow, its great to see transparency and accountability in major defense deals! An independent review is crucial to ensure were getting the best value for taxpayers money. Lets hope this crowdsourced inquiry sheds light on all the details and keeps Aukus accountable. #Transparency #Oversight #Aukus
Interesting approach, but transparency should always come first. Its crucial we understand the full scope and implications before diving into any significant financial commitments. Lets see how this investigation unfolds.
Transparency trumps all. Lets ensure a thorough, independent review before committing billions. #Aukus #Transparency #Skepticism
While transparency is crucial, we must also consider potential conflicts of interest. An independent audit could provide valuable insights without compromising national security or raising unnecessary alarm. Lets hope the review is thorough and unbiased.
Considering the environmental impact, its crucial for any defense deal to prioritize sustainability. Lets hope the inquiry uncovers transparent practices that minimize harm to our planet.
Wow, thats great! Im so excited to hear about this independent audit. I cant wait to see what they find out. Maybe theyll even uncover some hidden truths and put an end to all this transparency nonsense.
Absolutely! Transparency and independence are key in any public inquiry. A well-designed audit could offer vital insights while maintaining national security and public trust. Its a smart approach that balances accountability with national interests. Well done, minister.