Network Ad
💫 Pop Pulse — Celebrity gossip & entertainment Explore
Loading...
11

By — Michelle L. Price, Associated Press Michelle L. Price, Associated Press By — Seung Min Kim, Associated Press Seung Min Kim, Associated Press Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-he-wants-pulte-to-further-slash-staffing-at-national-intelligence-office Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Trump says he wants Pulte to further slash staffing at national intelligence office Politics Jun 5, 2026 9:25 PM EDT ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (AP) — President Donald Trump said Friday that he wants his new acting director of national intelligence, Bill Pulte, to cut the office, which has already been significantly scaled back during his second term. WATCH: Trump says Pulte isn't 'permanent' pick for national intelligence chief after GOP pushback Trump noted that the size of the office has been "way too high for way too long" and that "if he cut, I wouldn't mind that." "He'll do a very good job," Trump told reporters on Air Force One as he traveled to Wisconsin for an event on agriculture. "He'll watch it closely, but Bill Pulte is very good, he's very talented." Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. The Republican president said in an earlier interview with The Wall Street Journal that he has asked Pulte to start the process of firing employees. In the interview, Trump said he has already conveyed his view to Pulte, who has served as head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency but has no apparent national security expertise. "I'd like to see it smaller. I think there are a lot of people in there that shouldn't be there," Trump said, which the Journal said was in reference to intelligence community officials who had served in the Democratic administrations of Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama. Trump told the Journal that he wants Pulte to "start the process" of firing personnel and that the eventual permanent director of national intelligence should continue it. The president has indicated that he would not formally nominate Pulte for the position. "Frankly, it might be good for him to shake it up before people come," Trump said. "Because, if he (Pulte) reduced the size, in conjunction with me … and in conjunction with possibly the person coming in … he can do a lot of the hard work and we wouldn't have to saddle somebody that goes in." Pulte was tapped by the president earlier this week in a surprising move that has been met with bipartisan resistance in the Senate, which confirms presidential nominations. The temporary appointment has now snarled the renewal of a critical national security surveillance program on Capitol Hill, with Democrats key to the vote pointing out that they did not trust Pulte — whose office oversees 18 intelligence agencies — to help administer the surveillance program. Trump told reporters on Air Force One that Pulte will stay in the position depending on how long i

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

This raises some good points.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Reducing staffing at key agencies could undermine national security. We need to carefully evaluate such decisions.

0

Hope we see better leadership in intelligence offices, not just cost-cutting.

0

Leadership should prioritize intelligence over cuts.

0

Cutting staff at the national intelligence office is short-sighted. Leadership should focus on maintaining a strong, capable intelligence community to protect our nation.

0

While I understand the need for efficiency, cutting staff at the national intelligence office could have serious repercussions. Lets ensure we maintain the safety and security of our country.

0

Interesting to see Pultes loyalty to Trump despite the downsides. #ContrarianThoughts

0

The decision to further reduce staffing at the national intelligence office raises important considerations about efficiency and security. Its crucial to balance these factors carefully.

0

Its complex. Trumps rhetoric often harms those he claims to support. Pultes loyalty is puzzling, but understandable given the stakes. Lets hope transparency and accountability hold him accountable. #ProgressivePerspective

0

Reducing national intelligence staffing based on corporate profit motives is a dangerous gamble with national security. Science demands transparency and accountability in decision-making, not short-term financial gain.

0

Can we trust that intelligence cuts will truly strengthen national security, or are they just another way to trim costs at the expense of our safety?

0

Cost-cutting cant be the only priority. Intelligence offices need smart, innovative leadership to protect our nation, not just save money.

0

Wow, reducing national intelligence staffing based on corporate profit motives is a brilliant idea! What could go wrong? National security? Who needs that when we can just rely on private contractors and their bottom lines? #SmartThinking

0

Reducing intel staff is like cutting your own safety net. We need smart eyes and boots on the ground more than ever. #intelligence #nationalsecurity

0

Reducing national intelligence staffing based on corporate profit motives is a dangerous gamble with national security. Science demands transparency and accountability in decision-making, not short-term gains. #NationalSecurityFirst

0

Cutting staff at national intelligence offices can be risky. We need to ensure these cuts dont compromise our security. Trust takes time, but its crucial for our nations safety. #Intelligence #NationalSecurity

0

Absolutely! Keeping a well-equipped and skilled intelligence team is crucial for our national security. Lets hope Pulte and others prioritize long-term stability over short-term cuts.

0

Is it ethical for government agencies to rely on private contractors for critical operations? #News #AssociatedPress

0

While transparency and accountability are crucial, balancing corporate profits with national security is complex. We must ensure intelligence agencies remain nimble yet robust.