Network Ad
🏈 Bleacher Wire — Sports news & hot takes Explore
Loading...
8

Image source, Getty Images By Ana Faguy Washington Published 29 minutes ago Several New York Times journalists were summoned to testify under oath after they reported alleged security concerns involving President Donald Trump's new Air Force One plane, the US newspaper said. Federal agents delivered subpoenas to reporters' homes demanding they appear before a federal grand jury investigating a potential crime, the Times said. The New York Times had published stories alleging that the Qatari-gifted plane being used by Trump was not secure enough, and the Secret Service urged him to switch planes on his way home from a Nato summit in Turkey. The Justice Department said in a statement to the BBC that it is investigating illegal leaks of national security information. David McCraw, the Times's top newsroom lawyer, called the summons a "brazen act" and "nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs". The subpoenas - a legal requirement from a court or government agency that compels a person to appear or produce records or evidence - say the reporters' testimony is required "in regard to an alleged violation of federal criminal law", the Times reported. The summonses require the reporters to appear before a grand jury in Manhattan on Wednesday, the Times said. Grand jurys are composed of members of the public and convened by the US government to examine evidence and decide if there is enough to charge a person or persons with a crime. The New York Times reported on security concerns about the president's plane citing unnamed sources. While speaking to media about classified information is a crime, the US Constitution protects the freedom of the press to report information in the public interest. "We value and appreciate the important role that the press plays in this country, but DOJ also plays an important role to make sure that the people entrusted with our nation's secrets do what they're supposed to do with that information, which means not sharing classified information," the Justice Department (DoJ) said in a statement provided to the BBC. The Times reported on Wednesday that while Trump flew to the Nato summit in Turkey on the new Air Force One, he left the summit on an older plane on the advice of the Secret Service. The next day, the newspaper reported that security officials were concerned the newer plane did not have advanced security features, including antimissile capabilities. "Our journalists report the facts and advance the American public's right to know how their government is operating and their taxpayer dollars are being used," McCraw, the Times' lawyer, said. Other outlets published similar reports, including CBS News, the BBC's US news partner. A former US government official told CBS that there was not enough time or money for the plane to be updated with the security requirements to serve as Air Force One. While these reports w

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

This raises some good points.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

This raises some good points.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.