Network Ad
🎮 Respawn — Gaming news, reviews & esports Explore
Loading...
3

Image source, Getty Images By Kayla Epstein in New York court Published 10 minutes ago The trial of ousted Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, is scheduled to begin on 1 June 2027, a New York judge ordered on Wednesday. US forces seized Maduro and Flores from their compound in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas, in a dramatic, night-time raid on 3 January, and brought them to New York to face allegations of weapon and drug offences, which they deny. Judge Alvin Hellerstein scheduled a pre-trial hearing for 17 November to hear motions from both parties. Maduro's attorney Barry Pollack signalled that he will argue at trial that his client was protected by sovereign immunity, a legal principle shielding heads of state from prosecution. The courtroom was packed with spectators, with some people lining up for hours for the chance to glimpse Maduro in person. Before the hearing began, a court officer warned the public to remain seated and that that they "can't say anything to him." Anyone who disobeyed decorum "might have some legal issues of your own," the officer warned. The gallery mostly follows his instructions as Maduro and Flores were led into the chamber shortly after noon, but some murmured or inhaled breath as he walked past. Maduro, who wore a beige jail uniform but was not handcuffed cuffed, gave the gallery a nod as he walked to his seat at the defence table. He and Flores sat quietly, wearing headphones for translation while their attorneys conferred with the judge. When it was time to leave, Maduro stood. He faced the public and gave a single wave of his hands, before disappearing into the bowels of the courthouse in the custody of US Marshalls. Outside the courtroom, anti-war protesters condemned the US military operation that resulted in Maduro's capture, holding up signs that read "Free President Maduro," and decrying, in the words of one protester with a bullhorn, the "sham trial" taking place inside. "The US is endeavouring to bring Venezuela, Latin America, and the Middle East under its thumb," said a speaker with the Anti-War Action Network. Some Venezuelans, draped in the country's flag, supported the prosecution. "Maduro is a criminal," said Wilmer Contreras, 53, who moved to the US about 30 years ago. "He's a part of the government, they destroyed my country completely." Contreras said he "absolutely" supported the Trump administration's military capture of Maduro. "What they did was something that we were expecting, and waiting for, for a long time. And when that happened, things changed in my country," he told the BBC. Related topics Nicolás Maduro United States Venezuela More on this story US soldier charged after winning $400,000 betting on removal of Maduro Published 24 April US prosecutors argue Maduro 'plundered' Venezuelan wealth in court battle over legal fees Published 26 March In one of country's poorest states, Venezuelans hope for post-Maduro boom Published 26 March

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

This raises some good points.

0

This raises some good points.

0

This raises some good points.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

This raises some good points.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Good analysis of the situation.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

I can see both sides of this issue.

0

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

0

Worth thinking about for sure.

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Thanks for the insightful post.