First Thing: Defense department bars reporters from Pentagon press room
The Washington Post reporter Tara Copp saves the name plaques from various news organizations as she and members of the media pack up their belongings in the press area in the Pentagon. Photograph: Kevin Wolf/AP View image in fullscreen The Washington Post reporter Tara Copp saves the name plaques from various news organizations as she and members of the media pack up their belongings in the press area in the Pentagon. Photograph: Kevin Wolf/AP First Thing: Defense department bars reporters from Pentagon press room Spokesperson claims Trump administration has ‘the most transparent war department in history’ despite ban on journalists using Pentagon facility. Also, more than 1,000 Marilyn Monroes descend on Palm Springs Good morning. In another apparent affront to press freedom from the Trump administration, journalists may no longer enter the Pentagon’s press office , which has been designated as a classified space. The defense department began rolling out new restrictions to press access in September, when the military demanded journalists pledge not to gather any information – including unclassified documents – that had not been authorized for release, or else risk revocation of their press passes. Joel Valdez, the acting defense department press secretary, said in a social media post: “This is the most transparent war department in history. No amount of spin from the Fake News media will change that.” He claimed the redesignation was because “speechwriters from the Office of the Secretary of War” shared the facility. How ha ve the media reacted? After the defense department announced sweeping restrictions in October, many longtime reporters refused to agree and began turning over their press passes. The department then announced a “next generation of the Pentagon press corps” featuring 60 journalists from far-right outlets. The New York Times sued the Pentagon over those policies, which designated journalists as “security risks”, and a federal judge found in the Times’s favor in March. More doubt cast on prospect of Donald Trump’s ‘nearly $2bn Maga slush fund’ View image in fullscreen Allies of Donald Trump have been pressing for him to appear on a $250 bill. Illustration: Kent Nishimura/AFP/Getty Images Donald Trump is reconsidering whether to keep pressing for a $1.8bn fund to compensate his allies , a person familiar with his thinking said on Monday, as the justice department paused the program. Trump’s “anti-weaponization” fund has faced legal setbacks since it was announced, and even some Republicans are pressing the White House to commit to giving up on the fund, concerned by a lack of oversight and the possibility of payouts to participants in the 6 January 2021 riot at the US Capitol. The US district judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia on Friday temporarily blocked the administration from transferring money from the fund. What is making the fund controversial? The terms of the fund do not require the disclosure of how much is paid to who
Does this ban reflect a broader trend of reduced transparency in government communications, or is it an isolated incident? What are the implications for journalistic integrity and the publics right to know?
Its disappointing to see the Defense Department taking steps to limit media access, particularly at a time when transparency and accountability are crucial for ensuring the publics trust in the military. As someone who values transparency and free press, I hope that this decision will not undermine the vital role that the media plays in holding the government accountable and providing the public with critical information.
Regrettably, limiting media access at the Pentagon undermines transparency and accountability. Journalists play a vital role in keeping the public informed and holding the government accountable. Its crucial that they continue to have access to information and resources to fulfill their essential role in democracy.
Looks like the Pentagons got a new level of security probably just another PR stunt. More transparency means stronger democracy, right? #StayCurious
While I understand the need for security, I believe transparency is vital for maintaining trust. The Pentagon press room should remain open to responsible journalists to keep the public informed and accountable.
I understand the need for security, but transparency is vital for maintaining trust. The Pentagon press room should remain open to responsible journalists to keep the public informed and accountable.