Facebook whistle-blower sits in silence in panel discussion about her tell-all book
Facebook whistle-blower sits in silence in panel discussion about her tell-all book 44 minutes ago Share Save Add as preferred on Google Paul Pigott BBC Wales Hay Festival Facebook whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams did not speak at a panel about her book because of a threat of legal action An ex-Facebook executive sat in silence during a panel discussion about her tell-all book about the social media giant because of ongoing legal action by her former bosses at Meta. New Zealand-born Sarah Wynn-Williams was introduced as "an author in a hostage situation" at the Hay Festival, Powys, on Sunday. She is under threat of further legal by Meta if she does anything to promote her book, Careless People, explained investigative journalist Carole Cadwalladr. Meta denied trying to "silence" Wynn-Williams or restrict her freedom of speech, adding an interim order prohibited her from book promotion. Cadwalladr read part of a letter from Wynn-Williams' lawyer, explaining their understanding of her legal predicament. "Meta obtained a temporary order preventing Ms Wynn-Williams from promoting her book or speaking about certain topics regardless of whether what she says is true," it said. Cadwalladr appeared with Wynn-Williams and academic Tim Wu at the event. Hay Festival Wynn-Williams sat in silence as the other panelists discussed her "hostage situation" Wynn-Williams is one of the most senior former Meta executives to speak about Mark Zuckerberg. Wu called the lawsuit a "machine reaction, not a personal vendetta". He accused Meta of "maximising the punishment" as a warning to any other would-be Meta whistleblowers. "This is performative," said Cadwalladr. Wu, a professor at Columbia University in New York, who was involved in the Obama and Biden administrations, called it "censorship". "This is the age of private censorship, this is the assertion of power, a demonstration that some of the worst abuses in our society are not confined to kings, emperors, governments... but to a class of companies that have assumed the sort of sovereign effect and seek to assert their power the same way that despotic nations do." Meta said the assertion it was restricting Wynn-Williams' freedom of speech or trying to silence her "is not what's happening here". "There is a binding interim arbitration award against Ms Wynn-Williams which she agreed to during her time at Meta and which explicitly prohibits her from promoting her book," it said. "This is an arbitrator's order, not Meta deciding to silence anyone. "We are entitled to ask that the terms of that order be observed." More top stories Nature-loving disabled woman 'literally padlocked out' of favourite landscapes Danny Dyer's mansion on TV series Rivals goes on sale Larry Lamb 'lucky' to land EastEnders and Gavin and Stacey roles Social media Facebook Books Meta Wales
Interesting development in the case of Sarah Wynn-Williams. How does this situation reflect the challenges faced by whistleblowers in navigating legal battles with their former employers? #FreeSpeech #Whistleblower
Does this silence reflect a systemic issue of fear and control, or are there brave souls willing to stand up for truth and justice?
Looks like Sarah Wynn-Williams is in a tough spot. Cant wait to see how this plays out.
Despite threats, Sarah Wynn-Williams stands as a beacon of courage and truth. Her silence speaks volumes about the power of fear versus the resilience of the human spirit.
In todays complex world, its crucial to protect the rights of whistleblowers like Sarah Wynn-Williams. Their courage in revealing wrongdoing should be celebrated, not silenced, by those seeking to maintain power. The challenges they face highlight the need for stronger legal protections and transparency in corporate governance. #FreeSpeech #JusticeForWhistleblowers
How can we continue to support Sarah Wynn-Williams courage and push for transparency, when those in power choose silence and cover-ups? #StandWithWhistleblowers
Its fascinating to see how government regulations and free speech intersect in this case.